Legal Opinion

Sanyo Electric, Inc. v. M/V Hanjin Incheon

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided October 5, 1983No. C-81-1074Published

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

CONTI, District Judge,

Sitting by Designation.

This matter having come on for trial on the 26th day of September, 1983, plaintiff being represented by Gary W. House of Detéls, Madden, Crockett & McGee, and defendant being represented by Theodore A. LeGros of LeGros, Buchanan, Paul & Whitehead, and the court having heard the testimony of the witnesses, and having received the documentary evidence, and having considered the same, the court hereby issues the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law pursuant to Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co., Inc., in Personam, and Ss Marjorie Lykes, Her Engines, Tackle, Etc., in RemCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. Blasser Bros. v. Northern Pan-American LineCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. ET Barwick Mills, Inc. v. Hellenic Lines LimitedDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1971
  4. Dillingham Shipyard, an Affiliate of Dillingham Corporation, and Continental Insurance Company, and Cross-Appellants v. Associated Insulation Co., Ltd., and Third-Party and Cross-Appellee v. United States of America, Third-Party and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API