Legal Opinion

Hogg v. Siebrecht

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1990No. 17008, 17009PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Justice.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY/ISSUES

Daryl Hogg (Hogg) commenced this action by service of Summons and Complaint on June 10, 1989. Hogg accused Marvin E. Siebrecht (Siebrecht) of the failure to act in a fiduciary manner towards him, violation of his obligation of good faith and fair dealing, and a reckless and wanton disregard of Hogg’s rights together with outright fraud in his capacity as receiver of Hogg’s property.

Siebrecht responded with a Motion to Dismiss. Per stipulation at oral argument, the Motion was converted to a Motion for Summary Judgment. Judgment was entered in favor…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Matter of Estate of NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Vander Vorste v. Northwestern National BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Yaw v. BeeghlyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  5. Schmidt v. ZellmerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ramos v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. SDDS, Inc. v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Springer v. BlackSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Farmer v. South Dakota Department of Revenue & RegulationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Matter of Guardianship of JankeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API