Legal Opinion · Dissent

Schmalzried v. Findley

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 13, 1981No. 80-601Published

1DissentHubbart, Chief Judge

I must respectfully dissent. I would affirm the final summary judgment under review because, in my view, there is no genuine issue of material fact as to whether the plaintiff real estate brokers herein earned their commission by producing a buyer ready, willing, and able to purchase the subject multi-million dollar business upon terms acceptable to their client, the defendant seller. The record with unmistakable clarity shows that the defendant seller emphatically rejected the putative buyer’s offers to buy, that the said buyer’s terms were never finalized or accepted by the defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McAllister Hotel v. PorteSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Zaydon v. WilderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  3. Wilder v. BurtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  4. Wilder v. ZaydonSupreme Court of Florida · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API