Legal Opinion

Boulware v. Roosje

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1935Published

1Opinion of the Court

The action is to recover the past due installments under a contract for the sale of real property between plaintiff’s assignor as vendor and the defendant as vendee. Judgment of the County Court of Orange county in favor of plaintiff unanimously affirmed, with costs. The action to enforce collection of these past due installments was instituted prior to the law day fixed in the contract. The covenants of the parties were independent and, therefore, the want of title in the vendor at the time the action was instituted was not a bar to such an action. A different rule would apply if the action…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Robb v. MontgomeryNew York Supreme Court · 1822
  2. Harrington v. HigginsNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  3. McNeil v. GoldsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API