Legal Opinion

Marusevich v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 20, 2003PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Whelan, J.), entered August 5, 2002, as granted the motion of the defendant Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., for *840summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff was injured when she was struck by a six-pack of beer which fell from a shelf in a supermarket operated by the defendant Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hofmann v. Toys "R" Us — NY Limited PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Ruggiero v. Waldbaums Supermarkets, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Crawford v. Pick Quick Foods, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ingram v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Caldwell v. Pathmark Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Bodden v. Mayfair Supermarkets, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Ingram v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. Tango v. Costco Wholesale Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API