Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ascension v. Saenz

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 19, 1961No. 13799Published

1DissentMurray, Chief Justice

I do not concur in the opinion of the majority and will now state the reasons for my dissent.

In the opinion of the majority the nature of the suit has not been correctly stated. In their amended petition, appellants correctly stated the nature of their suit as follows: “This is a petition as amended, to set aside deed obtained by fraud; and likewise a petition for specific performance of contract for sale of real estate; * * This statement is followed by an allegation to the effect that G. W. Wilkinson and Fielmon Saenz “connived and schemed with one another, with wrongful and fraudulent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Perry v. LongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  2. Rincon Inv. Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Brown v. HempkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Duke v. City Nat. Bank of ForneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API