Legal Opinion

Aetna Investment Co. v. Chandler Landscape & Floral Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArnold, J.

This is an action to recover on a series of seven written instruments, in tbe amount of $50 each, bearing six per cent interest from maturity and an attorney’s fee on each. These instruments each bore the same serial number (102), were executed and delivered at the same time and were payable six months apart. ,Both plaintiff and defendant are corporations, organized under the law. The former has its headquarters at Indianapolis, Indiana, and the latter at Kansas City, Missouri.

The petition is in seven counts, each covering one of the written instruments, identical in all respects except as to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. City National Bank v. Goodloe-McClelland Commission Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Meier v. MeierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  3. Chenoweth v. Pacific Express Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Robinson v. LevySupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  5. Wolfley v. WootenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lampe v. Franklin American Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  2. John Deere Co. of St. Louis v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. Securities Investment Co. v. HicksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Bratten, Admr. v. McKelveyOhio Court of Appeals · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API