Legal Opinion

Fee v. Wells

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1918No. 8944PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Denver District Court, Hon. H. S. Class, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garrigues

*349Plaintiff and defendant are daughters of Mrs. Wells, deceased, and the action was brought by Miss Wells, as plaintiff, against her sister, Mrs. Fee, as defendant, to impress a trust in favor of plaintiff, who was an invalid, upon the proceeds of a life insurance policy, paid defendant, upon the life of their mother, who died July 23, 1914. For ten years prior thereto Mrs. Wells carried a policy in the Prudential Life Insurance Company of America, insuring her life in the sum of $1,000. Her estate was the original beneficiary. In 1909 her son Fred was named beneficiary, and in August, 1912,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  2. Wason v. ColburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  3. Skeen v. MarriottUtah Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Freeman v. PetersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  5. Frazee v. Phoenix National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Merchants Nat. Bank of Mobile v. BertollaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  2. Zolintakis v. OrfanosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  3. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. HeynDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API