G. N. Wagner & Bro. v. Crook
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal No. 269, Jan. T., 1895, by-plaintiffs, from judgment of C. P. Susquehanna Co., Aug. T., 1891, No. 356, for defendant on case stated. Case stated for the opinion of the court in the nature of a special verdict in an action of assumpsit.
Read the full summary
Appeal No. 269, Jan. T., 1895, by-plaintiffs, from judgment of C. P. Susquehanna Co., Aug. T., 1891, No. 356, for defendant on case stated. Case stated for the opinion of the court in the nature of a special verdict in an action of assumpsit. The material portions of the case stated appear by the opinion of Sbarle, P. J., which was as follows: “The parties in the above entitled case have agreed upon the facts, and submitted them to the court, in a case stated in the nature of a special verdict. “ The facts necessary for the determination of the case are briefly as follows : “ October 1,1889,…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
This appeal is from the judgment entered in favor of the defendant on the case stated. All that need be said in vindication of the correctness of the judgment will be found in the opinion of the learned president of the court below. For reasons given by him the judgment was rightly entered, and should not be disturbed.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by5 opinions
- Winchester Milling Co. v. Bank of WinchesterTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
- Minneapolis Sash & Door Co. v. Metropolitan BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Farley National Bank v. Pollock & BernheimerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
- Planters' Mercantile Co. v. Armour Packing Co. of Louisiana, Ltd.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1915
- Foster v. Peoples BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933