Legal Opinion

Xerox Corp. v. Board of County Commissioners

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 9, 2003No. 02CA2026PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Justice KIRSHBAUM. *

Plaintiff, Xerox Corporation, appeals the summary judgment entered in favor of defendants, the Boards of Equalization and the County Assessors of Arapahoe, Boulder, and El Paso Counties, and intervenor, the Property Tax Administrator (the Administrator). We affirm.

L

Plaintiff manufactures, leases, and sells various types of equipment, including copiers, printers, and reproduction devices and accessories. Because it owns the equipment it directly leases to consumers, under §§ 39-5-107 & 39-5108, C.R.S.2002, plaintiff must annually file personal property declaration…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Board of Assessment Appeals v. Colorado Arlberg ClubSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. Board of Assessment Appeals of State v. E.E. Sonnenberg & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. City & County of Denver v. Board of Assessment AppealsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. Gilpin County Board of Equalization v. RussellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  5. May Stores Shopping Centers, Inc. v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jefferson County Board of County Commissioners v. S.T. Spano Greenhouses, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Williams v. Department of Public SafetyColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Jet Black, LLC v. Routt County Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Williams v. Department of Public SafetyColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Williams v. Department of Public Safety, Colorado State PatrolColorado Court of Appeals · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API