Legal Opinion

Nutter v. Framingham & Lowell Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 10, 1881PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

This is a trustee process. A railroad corporation, summoned as trustee, in its general answer stated that, at the time of the service of the plaintiff’s writ, it had in its hands no goods, effects or credits of the principal defendant. In answer to interrogatories three and six, duly filed by the plaintiff, it stated that it was lessee of the principal defendant, and that two instalments of rent were due by it under the lease; and further stated that, “ after adjustment of all mutual demands between said defendant and said trustee, a balance of more than $100,000 was due the said trustee from…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Krogman v. Rice Bros.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Mortland v. Bernard Little & TrusteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  3. Emery v. BidwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  4. MacAusland v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  5. Grise v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API