Legal Opinion

Seastrunk v. Walker

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 6, 1941No. 2360PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALE, Justice.

On December 31, 1936, appellees, R. J.. Walker and wife, conveyed to appellant,. R. L. Seastrunk, a plot of ground approximately 75 x 105 feet, described specifically-by metes and bounds, the deed of conveyance reciting that such property is “now occupied by a filling station.” The deed as recorded contained a clause, immediately following the description of the 75 x 105' feet, granting to appellant an easement on, over and across an additional plot of 50 x 50 feet adjoining the property conveyed,, “for the use and benefit of said filling station so long as the land above…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. F. J. Harrison & Co. v. BoringTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. CaswellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  3. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Duggan v. BucknerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  5. Citizens State Bank of Houston v. GilesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hubert v. Davis, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2005
  2. Jones v. Fuller, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1993
  3. Hoak v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. Greathouse v. Texas Public Utilities Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  5. Perry v. City of GainesvilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API