Legal Opinion

State v. Dymond

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 28, 2001No. A00A2325PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ellington, Judge.

The trial court granted Julie Anne Dymond’s motion to suppress, and, subsequently, under OCGA § 17-7-170 (b), it also granted Dymond’s motion for discharge and acquittal of her pending DUI charge. In so doing, the trial court found that the State failed to timely try the case in compliance with Dymond’s demand for a speedy trial. In this appeal, the State contests the rulings on both motions. Because the trial court misconstrued and overlooked the applicable law, we reverse.

The underlying case arose from a single misdemeanor DUI charge against Dymond. The evidence shows that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Vansant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. LaFontaine v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  3. State v. WatersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  4. Brent v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  5. Fletcher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Baker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  2. Love v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. Harwood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. Fisher v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  5. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API