Legal Opinion

Fitzner v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided March 31, 1959No. Docket No. 68296Published

To establish the total amount expended on the support of his three children during the year in issue, petitioner relied upon statements contained in a revenue agent's report. Held, in the absence of agreement, revenue agents' reports are not proof of facts stated therein, and there being no other evidence, petitioner has failed to establish the total amount expended for support, and, correlatively, has not proven that he contributed an amount in excess of one-half thereof.

1Opinion of the Court

James H. Fitzner, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Fitzner v. Commissioner

Docket No. 68296

United States Tax Court

31 T.C. 1252; 1959 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 205;

March 31, 1959, Filed

Decision will be entered for the respondent.

To establish the total amount expended on the support of his three children during the year in issue, petitioner relied upon statements contained in a revenue agent's report. Held, in the absence of agreement, revenue agents' reports are not proof of facts stated therein, and there being no other evidence, petitioner has failed to establish the total…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fitzner v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  2. Blundon v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1935
  3. Wood v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  4. Series "A" Trust v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API