Legal Opinion
Flanagan v. The Scow H. F. Gilligan
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 30, 1959PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FREDERICK van PELT BRYAN, District Judge.
Respondent Red Star Towing & Transportation Corporation excepts to the count alleged against it in the third amended libel, asserting that it fails to state a claim since it does not allege facts showing that libelant was performing “crew work” in the service of respondent’s vessel.
Libelant is a barge captain. He was employed, not by respondent Red Star, but by respondent New York Trap Rock Corporation aboard its scow Gilligan. The Gilligan was one of four barges under tow by respondent Red Star’s tug Boston in New York waters.
The second count in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Boudoin v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Keen v. Overseas Tankship Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Imperial Oil, Limited v. Frank DrlikCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- Andrew Oroz v. American President Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Redman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- John H. Williams v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, and Third-Party v. William Spencer & Son Corporation, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Cerro Sales Corp. v. Atlantic Marine Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Nikiforow v. RittenhouseDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- Reilly v. B No. 100 Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1977