Em-Co Metal Products, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Goolsby, Judge:
The sole question for our consideration in this action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien is whether there was an abuse of discretion amounting to an error of law on the part of the lower court in relieving the respondents Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. (A & P), and Haskell Company from default judgments and allowing them to answer. The appellant Em-Co Metal Products, Inc., asserts that the order appealed from was without evidentiary support and was controlled by an error of law. We disagree and affirm.
Em-Co served A & P, Haskell, and M & C Steel, Inc., with a summons,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Renney v. Dobbs House, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- Ledford v. Pennsylvania Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Mutual Life Insurance v. O'DonnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Stewart Ex Rel. Estate of Stewart v. FloydSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- Rochester v. Holiday Magic, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Mann v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
- Ammons v. HoodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Petty v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- McClurg v. DeatonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Berry v. IanuarioCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.