Legal Opinion

Em-Co Metal Products, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 3, 1984No. 0036PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge:

The sole question for our consideration in this action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien is whether there was an abuse of discretion amounting to an error of law on the part of the lower court in relieving the respondents Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. (A & P), and Haskell Company from default judgments and allowing them to answer. The appellant Em-Co Metal Products, Inc., asserts that the order appealed from was without evidentiary support and was controlled by an error of law. We disagree and affirm.

Em-Co served A & P, Haskell, and M & C Steel, Inc., with a summons,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Renney v. Dobbs House, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Ledford v. Pennsylvania Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  3. Mutual Life Insurance v. O'DonnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Stewart Ex Rel. Estate of Stewart v. FloydSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  5. Rochester v. Holiday Magic, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Mann v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  2. Ammons v. HoodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  3. Petty v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  4. McClurg v. DeatonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  5. Berry v. IanuarioCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API