Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Shoemaker

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 11, 1973No. Appeal, 858PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Spaeth, J.,

Appellant contends that his sentence should be set aside because the pre-sentence report showed that he had been arrested a number of times but did not state what disposition had been made of the arrests.

On January 19, 1973, appellant was adjudged guilty of burglary and larceny of a window fan from a storage bin in an apartment building. The trial was before a judge sitting without a jury, and after the verdict was announced, appellant, through counsel, offered to stand for sentencing that day. A rather lengthy interrogation by the court ensued. Appellant was ashed about…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Commonwealth v. WronaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. United States of America Ex Rel. Arthur Jackson v. David N. Myers, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Graterford, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KrumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. LeBlancMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. TisdaleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. HillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API