Hayworth v. Worthington
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Wayne Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDewey, J.
Assumpsit; plea, general issue; verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs below.
On the trial of the cause, the plaintiffs gave in evidence to the jury an instrument of writing executed by one James Hayworth, acknowledging an absolute sale by him of a quantity of bacon to the plaintiffs. The defendant, who claimed the same bacon under a subsequent purchase from James Hayworth, offered to prove by parol the instrument, a bill of sale, under which, the plaintiffs claimed, though absolute upon its face, was designed by the parties to it to be only a mortgage to secure a debt which Hayworth owed to…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Walton v. Cronly's AdministratorNew York Supreme Court · 1835
- Bogle, Somerville, & Co. v. VowlesCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1798
- Aborn v. BurnettIndiana Supreme Court · 1827
3Cited by10 opinions
- Babcock v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
- Beatty v. BrummettIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Fuller v. ParrishMichigan Supreme Court · 1854
- Hazzard v. DukeIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Butcher v. StultzIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.