Legal Opinion
Matsushita Electronics Corp. v. Loral Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 22, 1997No. 92 Civ. 5461(BSJ)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JONES, District Judge.
In September 1991, defendants Loral Corporation and Loral Fairchild Corporation (collectively, “Loral”) brought suit in the Eastern District of Virginia (the “Eastern District Litigation”) 1 against Matsushita Electronics, Inc. (“MEI”) and other major electronics manufacturers for infringing upon patents owned by Loral (the “patents-in-suit”). The patents-in-suit cover certain charged coupled devices (“CCDs”), which are the semiconductor chips used as the “seeing-eye” in video' cameras and facsimile machines. Plaintiff Matsushita Electronics Corporation (“MEC”) 2…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Manor Nursing Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- I.G. Second Generation Partners, L.P. v. ReadeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Cardtoons, L.C. v. Major League Baseball Players Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Krasnyi Oktyabr, Inc. v. Trilini ImportsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- B & G PLASTICS, INC. v. Eastern Creative Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Primetime 24 Joint Venture v. National Broadcasting Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.