Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Thompson v. Llewellyn

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1959No. 9909Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Angstman

I concur in the conclusion that plaintiffs failed to make out a case for the jury and that defendant’s motion for nonsuit should have been sustained.

I think, however, the cause should be remanded for a new trial. There is a difference of opinion among the courts on this point. See 5B O.J.S. Appeal and Error, see. 1941, p. 487, et seq., notes 2 and 3.

This court had that question before it in Gailbreath v. Armstrong, 118 Mont. 299, 167 Pac. (2d) 337, 339. In that case, plaintiff recovered verdict and judgment and there was failure to prove a certain issue vital to his right of recovery. This…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Galbreath v. ArmstrongMontana Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API