Legal Opinion
United States v. Nash
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided June 23, 1976No. Crim. 76-H-61, 76-H-83PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NOEL, District Judge.
These actions are before the Court on the motion of defendant Nash to suppress incriminating statements made by him during an interview on February 23, 1976 with Dennis A. Schreck, a special agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Defendant has alleged that these oral state ments were obtained in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602,16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). An evidentiary hearing was held on defendant’s motion and after consideration of the stipulations of the parties, the evidence adduced, and the arguments of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Beckwith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Orozco v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ronald Dale Windsor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Howard C. PhelpsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Fawaz YunisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Fairchild v. LockhartDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1989
- Toste v. LopesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1987
- United States v. AikensDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- United States v. Fawaz YunisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988