Legal Opinion

Filkosky v. Pennsylvania Rd.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 11, 1946No. 1956Published

1Opinion of the CourtSherick, P. J.

The petition in this case, an action for wrongful death occurring at a street crossing, alleges three specifications of negligence: First, that defendant negligently failed to give any signal of the approaching train; second, that defendant’s train was being operated at a high rate of speed, to wit, 60 miles per hour, in violation of the municipal ordinance; and third, that the crossing watchman failed to give decedent any warning or to use the stop sign in his possession to warn her of impending peril.

Defendant’s answer is a general denial and an averment that decedent’s injuries were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Toledo Term. Rd. Co. v. HughesOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Cunningham Hardware Co. v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Lohrey v. Baltimore & Ohio Rd. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Kasky v. Baltimore & Ohio Rd. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. Thomas v. Pennsylvania Rd. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API