Legal Opinion
Padilla v. Veyo LLC
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided August 16, 2024No. 2:23-cv-02380Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Marina Padilla, et al., No. CV-23-02380-PHX-JAT 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 Veyo LLC, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to amend the complaint.1 (Doc. 80). 16 Plaintiffs’ motion in its entirety states: 17 Pursuant [sic] Rule 15 and this Court’s May 20, 2024 order [ECF 45], Plaintiffs, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby moves [sic] to Amend 18 their Complaint against Defendants to add additional claims. After subpoenaing contracts between Defendants and Mercy…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Pliler v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- William George Bonin v. Arthur Calderon, as Warden of San Quentin State Prison James Rowland, Director of the California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Marilyn Miller v. Rykoff-Sexton, Inc., and Atlas Hotels, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.