Legal Opinion

Libert v. Unfried

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1907No. 6427PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for Garfield * county, Miller, J., entered May 12, 1906, in favor of the defendants, dissolving a temporary restraining order and vacating the appointment of a receiver.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

This action was commenced by W. A. Libert, plaintiff, as mortgagee, against Fred Unfried and Sylvia Unfried, his wife, mortgagors, to foreclose a chattel mortgage on a flock of sheep in Garfield county. The complaint, which *183was filed and served April 17, 1906, alleged that the defendant Fred Unfried had, without the knowledge or consent of plaintiff, sold about two hundred and sixty head of the sheep; that unless restrained he would make further sales; that the defendants were insolvent, and that the plaintiff had, at his option, under the terms of the mortgage, elected to declare all the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cole v. PriceWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Larsen v. WinderWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. State ex rel. Washington Match Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Libert v. UnfriedWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Unfried v. LibertIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
  3. State ex rel. Ridgely v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API