Legal Opinion
Capasso v. L. Pucillo & Sons, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 28, 1974PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pek (Juhiam.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth by Judge Kimmelman in his opinion, to which we add the following comments.
There is no merit to defendants’ contention that the Legislature, by enacting the Local Public Contracts Law, L. 1971, c. 198; N. J. S. A. 40A:11-1 et seq., impliedly repealed N. J. S. A. 40 :66-4 which provides in pertinent part that:
The governing body [of a municipality] may * * * contract with any person for * * * the collection, removal and disposal of ashes, garbage, refuse and waste matter or any portion thereof. Before making any such…
2Cited by9 opinions
- National Waste Recycling, Inc. v. Middlesex County Improvement Authority & Waste Management of North Jersey, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- In Re Application of Saddle RiverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- L. Pucillo & Sons, Inc. v. Belleville Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- State in Interest of ABNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Autotote Ltd. v. New Jersey Sports, Etc., Auth.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.