Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hall v. McGill

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1895No. 1,725PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Clark Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam. —

The appellant presents a motion to be permitted to substitute an amended complaint, the original of such amended complaint having been lost, as shown by affidavits submitted. The object of the motion is to place the record in condition to enable the appellant to move for a writ of certiorari, it being asserted that the amended complaint is not correctly copied into the transcript t>y the clerk. We are of opinion that this court has no power to grant leave to file substituted pleadings that were lost in the court below, but that the the appellant must seek relief in the trial…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Koeneman v. AldridgeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Mackey v. Lafayette Loan & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Koeneman v. AldridgeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API