Legal Opinion

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Amos

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided May 24, 2002No. 06-01-00108-CVPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice ROSS.

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. appeals the jury’s finding that it is guilty of the retaliatory discharge of Scottie Amos for filing a worker’s compensation claim, in violation of the Workers’ Compensation Act. Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 451.001 (Vernon 1996). The trial court rendered judgment on the jury’s verdict, awarding Amos $129,160.00 in damages, plus prejudgment and post-judgment interest. Wal-Mart filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and an alternative motion for new trial, which the trial court denied.

Wal-Mart contends: (1) there is no evidence, or…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Holley v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Alabama Power Co. v. AldridgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. Donald Parker v. Valerus Compression Services, LP, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  3. Willis v. Nucor Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
  4. La Tier v. Compaq Computer Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2003
  5. Lone Star Steel Co. v. Hatten, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API