Legal Opinion

Tankersley v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 24, 1916No. 8419PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConner, C. J.

The appellant instituted suit in the district court to recover upon six certain notes dated December 30, 1909, maturing December 1, 1910, 1911, 1912, 1913, 1914, and 19i5, respectively, and all aggregating $537.50. The notes had been executed by one W. E. Jackson as part of the consideration for a tract of land described in the petition sold by appellant, Tankersley, to Jackson on the same day the notes were executed. To secure the notes the vendor’s lien was retained, as a further part of tile consideration, Jackson also assumed the payment of a note for $200, executed by a former owner of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. C. M. Hapgood Shoe Co. v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. RaglandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. First Nat. Bank in Wellington v. McClellanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. West v. McCelvey Loan & Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Thompson v. Mayhew Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Tucker v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API