Legal Opinion

People v. Echlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed and matter remitted to Niagara County Court for resentencing in accordance with the following Memorandum: In order to establish defendant’s guilt of grand larceny in the third degree, the People were required to prove that the value of the stolen property exceeded three thousand dollars (see, Penal Law § 155.35). We conclude that the People failed to meet that burden. The victim’s hearsay testimony concerning the appraisals of certain items was not admissible to establish value (see, People v Jeffries, 151 AD2d 964, Iv denied…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. WombleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. People v. FunchessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. People v. JeffriesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. SLACK, JOHN J., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API