Legal Opinion

State v. Monarch Chemicals, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1981PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*344OPINION OF THE COURT

Howard A. Zeller, J.

Defendant Lee Knowles, Inc., moves to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 2) upon the ground the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, and in the alternative to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 3) and 1003 upon the grounds the State lacks the legal capacity to bring this action, or in the alternative, is not a proper party plaintiff; in the alternative, to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 7) for failure to state a cause of action; in the alternative to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 10) due…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Basso v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Ray v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. City of Milwaukee v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Putnam v. StoutNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Schenectady Chemicals, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. State v. Monarch Chemicals, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Stanley v. Amalithone Realty, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. Monarch Chemicals, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API