Legal Opinion

Dunford v. Townsend

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 27, 1959No. 37800PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Chief Judge.

The real-estate sale contract in the present case forming the basis of an action for real-estate commissions against the purchaser therein is too indefinite to be enforceable and therefore creates no obligation to pay commissions so as to sustain such an action since the sale contract provides that the purchaser would assume two loans, one of $500 at $25 per month and another of approximately $14,600, payable $93 per month. Morgan v. Hemphill, 214 Ga. 555 (105 S. E. 2d 580); C. V. Nalley, Inc. v. Schoen, 215 Ga. 513 (111 S. E. 2d 40). The court did not err in directing a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morgan v. HemphillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  2. C. V. Nalley, Inc. v. SchoenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ragsdale v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  2. Branan & Schmitz Realty, Inc. v. BallardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  3. NORTH FULTON REALTY CO., INC. v. KaneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  4. Hunter v. BenamyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  5. Moog v. PalmourCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API