Legal Opinion

Mikel v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 15, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMehaeey, J.

The grand jury of Sebastian County returned an indictment against the appellant charging him with ¡manufacturing intoxicating liquor. A change of venue was granted by the court to Scott County upon application of the appellant. There were three indictments against the appellant, one for manufacturing intoxicating liquor, another for possessing a still, and another for possessing mash. The jury found the appellant not guilty of the crime of possessing a still and also found him not guilty of the crime of possessing mash, but he was convicted of the crime of manufacturing intoxicating liquor…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Oakes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  2. Tuttle v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  3. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. PateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  4. Midland Valley Railroad v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  5. Hlass v. FulfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McCoy Farms, Inc. v. J & M McKEESupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. Vaughn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  3. Trammell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  4. Holcomb v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  5. McCoy Farms, Inc. v. J & M McKEESupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API