Legal Opinion
In re Darnell T.
New York City Family Court
Decided February 9, 1987PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Denis R. Hurley, J.
Respondent moves for a dismissal of the captioned delin*637quency petition, pursuant to Family Court Act § 315.1 (1) (a), upon the ground that it does not comply with the legal sufficiency criteria established by Family Court Act §§ 311.1 and 311.2. More particularly, he claims that it fails to establish by nonhearsay evidence an essential element of the underlying crime.
The petition alleges that respondent, in concert with two other juveniles, committed an act, which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of rape in the third degree, as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. DumasNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. EasleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- In re Rodney J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. JamesNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- People v. DixonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. OlivioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- In re Michael C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. HellerCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1998