Legal Opinion

Thomas v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 11, 1988No. 85-328PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELSON, Associate Judge:

This appeal presents a novel question concerning a trial judge’s authority to direct a jury to resume its deliberations. Immediately after the foreperson had announced findings of not guilty as to three counts, and guilty as to one, but before any verdict was recorded, counsel for defendant asked, without limitation, for a poll of the jury. The responses of the first two jurors polled revealed confusion with respect to the verdict on the count on which the guilty verdict had been returned. We hold that under these circumstances the trial judge’s direction that the jury…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Derrington v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. United States v. Edward Baker, Ralph Masciola and Dominick DinorscioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ShomoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  2. Speaks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Mitchell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Jenkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API