Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Blankenship v. Ethicon, Inc.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 2007No. 33224Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partStarcher, J.

(Filed December 26, 2007)

It is axiomatic that both the Legislature and the Court are constitutionally empowered to alter the common law. Courts amend the common law narrowly and incrementally, on a case-by-case basis and usually over many years. But the Legislature, when changing the common law, often makes drastic statutory changes in response to real or perceived crises, and often without a clear understanding of the impact those changes might have on individual cases. When the crises pass or are proven illusory, the Legislature is rarely impelled to repeal the statutes, and so statutes…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morningstar v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Carmichael v. ReitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Shepard v. Alexian Brothers Hospital, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Hill v. Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Phillips v. Larry's Drive-In Pharmacy, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API