Legal Opinion

Stamper v. Parr-Ruckman Home Town Motor Sales, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1971No. 70-72PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchneider, J.

Appellee acquired the automobile in question as a trade-in from one Adkins, who testified that he had driven it to the appellee’s lot and had not suffered any transmission or starting problems. Sometime after appellee’s purchase of the car, the automatic transmission became inoperable. Although the engine could be started, the car would not move. In addition, as a result of faulty wiring, the neutral switch on the car was defective, which meant that the engine would start in any gear.

Appellee later sold the same vehicle for $250, “as is,” to Willard Stamper, who was 19 years of age but…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Bennison v. Stillpass Transit Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Baier v. Cleveland Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Strock v. PressnellOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Shelton v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Wilke v. Woodhouse Ford, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Cornelius v. Bay Motors Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Treadwell Ford, Inc. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API