Legal Opinion
Orbach v. New York State Urban Development Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 10, 1981PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtOpinion Of The Court. Norman C. Ryp, J.
issue: “public hearing” — soliloquy or dialogue?
Does “public hearing” under the New York State Urban Development Corporation Act (UDCA) (L 1968, ch 174, as amd) require the presence of a listening ear by New York State Urban Development Corporation commissioners or duly delegated agents? That is the key issue herein.
Motion Nos. 165 and 166 of the August 19,1981 calendar are consolidated for purposes of disposition.
Petitioners Mets Parking Incorporated, 250 West 41st Street Corp., Joseph Orbach, Markus Orbach and Sidney Orbach, doing business as Three-0 Realty Company (petitioners) commenced…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- New York State Urban Development Corp. v. Vanderlex Merchandise Co.New York Supreme Court · 1979
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. KretchmerNew York Supreme Court · 1971
- Forest Hills Residents Ass'n v. New York City Housing AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1972
3Cited by1 opinion
- New York Public Interest Research Group Straphangers Campaign, Inc. v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 2003