Legal Opinion

W. M. Southern Realty Co. v. Schmidt

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 8, 1914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error : Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga county.

1Opinion of the Court

Pollock, J.; Metcalfe and Norris, JJ., concurring.

Proceedings were instituted before the commissioners of Cuyahoga county for the establishment of a public road through the lands of plaintiff in error and others.

The viewers in that proceeding made their report establishing the road and allowing to plaintiff in error compensation for the land taken and damages for the remainder, and this report was affirmed by the commissioners.

Plaintiff in error, being dissatisfied with the compensation allowed it for the land taken and damages given for the remainder, appealed to the probate court from the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kansas City, Olathe, Lawrence & Topeka Railway Co. v. WeidenmannSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  2. Atlantic & Ohio Railroad v. SullivantOhio Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Kansas City & Topeka Railway Co. v. VickroySupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  4. Union Pacific Railroad v. StanwoodNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Sullivan v. S. A. Brown & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Angelo Clark v. Robert CoupeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
  2. Einhorn v. Fleming Foods of Pennsylvania, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. Mario Reyes-RomeroCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  4. In Re Appropriation for Hwy. Purposes of Land of SeasOhio Court of Appeals · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API