Legal Opinion

Keough v. McNitt

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 15, 1862PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF RAMSEY COUNTY. Motion in the Supreme Court,- to substitute certain parties for the Plaintiff, the subject matter of the action having been assigned to them by the original Plaintiff, pending the action.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court

FlaNdrau, J.

This case was originally commenced in the District Court, and was tried by a referee. On the coming in of the report, judgment was entered upon it. A motion was then made to set aside the judgment and report oí the referee and for a new trial, which motion was granted and a new trial ordered. An appeal was then taken from the order so made to this Court, and the order was reversed, which had the effect of reinstating the report of the referee and the judgment uhic’.i had been previously set aside. The appeal from the order did not bring the cause into this Court, but…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sykes v. BeckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Baker v. Northwest Building & Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API