Legal Opinion
Violins v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 18, 1972No. 71-1067PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
The appellants [plaintiffs in the trial court] appeal from an adverse final judgment denying them recovery against the appellee [defendant in the trial court]. The final judgment rendered by the trial judge reads in part as follows:
“(a) On February 9, 1966 Diane Marie Ramy was the named insured under State Farm Mutual Automobile Policy No. 4483 785 B02 59 issued by the Defendant covering a 1965 two door Con-vair motor vehicle owned by Diane Marie Ramy, said policy being in full force and effect on such date.
“(b) On February 9, 1966 the said Diane Marie Ramy sustained bodily injuries by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reliance Mutual Life Insurance Co. of Ill. v. BooherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- John Tenopir v. State Farm Mutual Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- James W. Zipperer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- American Home Assurance Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schwab v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Withers v. Meridian Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1980