Legal Opinion
Young v. Seckler
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 31, 1980PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The plaintiffs in this automobile negligence action have alleged that the husband of the registered owner of the offending vehicle is the actual owner and they have, therefore, named him as a defendant. It is undisputed from papers submitted on the instant summary judgment motion that the funds for the purchase and subsequent maintenance of the car were provided by the husband. His position is undoubtedly duplicated in countless thousands—if not millions—of instances where motor vehicles have been bought and are maintained for the benefit of spouses or other…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Vincent v. RixNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- In re the Estate of SzaboNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Shaw v. Time-Life RecordsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Rawson v. . Pennsylvania Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Whiton v. . SnyderNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by18 opinions
- Gaeta v. MorganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Fulater v. Palmer's Granite Garage, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Sosnowski v. KolovasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Vergari v. KraiskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Terranova v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.