Legal Opinion
In Re Wilkinson
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided February 22, 2002No. 2001-B-2310PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
805 So.2d 142 (2002)
In re R. Neal WILKINSON.
No. 2001-B-2310.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
January 15, 2002.
Opinion on Grant of Rehearing in Part February 22, 2002.
Charles B. Plattsmier, Baton Rouge, Robert S. Kennedy, Jr., Counsel for Applicant.
Amy E. Counce, Francis A. Rougeou, Jr., Reymond N. Wilkinson, Baton Rouge, Counsel for Respondent.
ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
PER CURIAM.[*]
This disciplinary proceeding arises from one count of formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") against respondent, Neal W. Wilkinson, an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. GuidrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. EdwinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. KeysSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re CabibiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
- In re HallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004