Legal Opinion

Jurdak v. Figueroa

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1961PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph A. Suozzi, J.

In this action to partition real property, plaintiff moves under rule 109 of the Pules of Civil Practice to strike out a defense of insufficiency of defendant Figueroa, and under rule 112 for judgment on the pleadings.

The complaint is framed on the theory that the real property in question was conveyed to the plaintiff and defendant Figueroa as tenants by the entirety on October 8, 1951; that the parties were not married to each other and never have been; and that the conveyance accordingly resulted in a tenancy in common of the property, of which a partition is accordingly sought (Perrin v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of SuterNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Perrin v. HarringtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  3. In re the Estate of SutterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
  4. Claim of Strail v. Estate of SuterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  5. Steinberg v. SingerNew York Supreme Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Grossman v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API