Legal Opinion
Stork v. International Bazaar, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 30, 1989No. 21251-6-IPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSwanson, J.
Mae Stork appeals the trial court's judgment dismissing her claims of discrimination, harassment, emotional distress, and constructive discharge, and awarding costs to the defendants, International Bazaar, Inc., and Peter J. Hong. We affirm.
The trial court's findings of fact, which we find to be supported by substantial evidence, may be summarized as follows:
During January through June of 1985, Peter Hong was employed by International Bazaar, an import retail business, as an "independent consultant" who actively participated in most, if not all, aspects of International Bazaar's management.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Wilmot v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
- Allison v. Housing Authority of City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- MacKay v. Acorn Custom Cabinetry, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
- Carle v. McChord Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- Lords v. Northern Automotive Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.