Legal Opinion

Cobb v. Maccaro

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided October 5, 1992No. 1876PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Gardner, Judge:

Respondent, Frank Cobb (Cobb), filed a mechanic’s lien against the property of the Appellants, George E. and Ann S. Maccaro (the Macearos). The Macearos petitioned to vacate the lien under S.C. Code Ann. § 29-5-100 (1976) on the ground that Cobb had “wilfully and knowingly claimed more than is his due.” The trial judge denied the Macearos’ motion with leave to renew the issue during later proceedings. The Macearos appeal from the order. We dismiss because this order is not appealable.

DISCUSSION

The ability of this Court to hear appeals is limited by statute. See S.C. Code Ann. §…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gilmore v. IveyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  2. Sea Pines Co. v. Kiawah Island Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  3. Shields Ex Rel. Estate of Shields v. MARTIN MARIETTA CORP.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Rampey v. RampeyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  5. Associates Financial Services Co. v. Gordon's Auto Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Southern Industrial Contractors LLC v. O'Brien and Gere Inc of North AmericaDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API