Legal Opinion

Lucas v. Scott

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 11, 1945No. 4 Div. 351PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

This suit is in equity by appellee against appellants, under Code 1940, Title 47 § 2 et seq., to establish a disputed boundary line between coterminous lands.

The first assignment of error challenges the ruling of the chancellor in denying the defendants’ (appellants’) demand for a jury.

In equity, a party is not entitled, as of right, to a jury to decide the issues of fact unless it is so provided by statute or constitution. In the absence of such a provision the power and duty to determine finally all questions of fact and law devolve upon the court. Curb v. Grantham, 212…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tuscaloosa County v. ShamblinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Kidd v. BrowneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Alabama, Tenn. & Northern Ry. Co. v. Aliceville Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Green v. MarlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. Hill v. LindseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. JC Jacobs Banking Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Turnipseed v. MoseleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  3. Weston v. WestonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  4. Cumens v. GarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  5. Smith v. ClaybrookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API