ALFREDO A. v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
ARABIAN, J., Concurring and Dissenting.
I concur in the lead opinion insofar as it requires prompt probable cause determinations for juveniles within 72 hours of warrantless arrest. (See lead opn., ante, this page.) I respectfully dissent, however, from the due process analysis by which the lead opinion reaches this conclusion. Petitioner does not dispute his postarrest detention on that basis; nor does he raise such a challenge to any provision of the juvenile court law governing wardship detentions in general (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602 et seq.). Rather, he asserts that, like any adult in…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.