Legal Opinion · Dissent

Atlas Garage & Custom Builders, Inc. v. Hurley

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 15, 1974Published

1DissentBogdanski, J.

I cannot agree that the subsequent attachment of the plaintiff Atlas takes precedence over the prior attachment of the defendant Hurley. It is undisputed that both attachments were validly made in accordance with the *259provisions of the pertinent statutes. When a valid attachment is made, a lien on the property attached is created, which lien can be erased only by a subsequent dissolution of the attachment. Drake, Attachment (6th Ed.) §224. “An attachment of property on mesne process is a mode of obtaining security for the satisfaction of any judgment which the plaintiff may finally recover.”…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cary v. CarySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  2. Christiano v. ChristianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
  3. Wright v. WrightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  4. Morgan v. New York National Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
  5. Campbell v. KlahrSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API