Legal Opinion

Molnar v. State ex rel. Board of Medical Examiners

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1989No. 18746PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In July, 1985 appellant, E. Michael Molnar, M.D., applied to renew his Nevada certificate of biennial registration. One of the questions on the application was:

Since your last registration:

1. Have you been investigated, charged or convicted of unprofessional conduct, professional incompetence or gross or repeated malpractice by any medical licensing board or other agency, hospital or medical society?

Although he was aware there were allegations pending against him in California for unprofessional conduct, appellant checked the box designating “No” to the question.

As a result of…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
  4. Shawley v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Grow v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Minton v. Board of Medical ExaminersNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  2. TATE, JR., M.D. VS. NEV. STATE BD. MEDICAL EXAM'RNevada Supreme Court · 2015
  3. TATE, JR., M.D. VS. NEV. STATE BD. MEDICAL EXAM'RNevada Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API