Legal Opinion

Watson & Howell Builders v. Billingsley

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 30, 1992No. 1904Published

1Opinion of the Court

Gardner, Judge:

Watson <fe Howell Builders (the Builder) filed a Complaint and Lis Pendens seeking foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien on a custom home they had been hired to build. Jack and Patti Billingsley (the Billingsleys) counter-claimed for recovery of overpayment. The matter was referred to the Master for a final order, with direct appeal to the Supreme Court. The Master found in favor of the Builder, but offset the award for overcharges and ordered the Builder to repair certain items. We affirm in part and remand in part.

Foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien is an action at law. Glover v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. McCall v. FinleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  3. Tharpe v. G. E. Moore Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  4. Glover v. LewisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API